People ex rel. Schwartz v. Temple
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This action was instituted for the purpose of having two state patents, one for the east half and the other for the west half of a certain sixteenth section of land in San Diego county, vacated and set aside, so far as they affect the south half of the section, upon the ground that they were issued without authority of law, and were void.
The court below found the facts very fully, and gave judgment for the defendants, from which the plaintiffs appeal on the judgment-roll without any statement or bill of exceptions.. The facts found, so far as they need be noticed, are, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Grannis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.