Eaton v. Marcelle
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Per curiam
These are two cross actions of negligence growing out of an automobile collision on August 16, 1941, at the intersection of High and Oak Streets in the city of Bath. The jury found for Mr. Eaton in both actions. Miss Marcelle presents motions based on the usual grounds for a new trial in each action. No exceptions were taken and so it must be assumed that proper instructions as to the applicable law were given to the jury. Frye v. Kenney, 136 Me., 112, 115, 3 A. (2d), 433.
The parties presented to the jury conflicting facts and theories as to the cause of the collision. Mr. Eaton contended…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mizula v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- Young v. PotterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Dube v. ShermanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barlow v. LowerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
- Fotter v. ButlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
- Sanborn v. StoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Baker v. PetrinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
- Jenness v. ParkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.