Legal Opinion

Jenness v. Park

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 30, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per' cúriam. '

The plaintiff herein, after a jury verdict against him, alleges in a motion for a new trial that it is against the law aiid the evidence and against the weight of the evidence.

The issue in this case was whether or not the defendant committed an assault and battery on the plaintiff. It should be stated that the record discloses no exceptions and so it niüst be presumed that the jury which heard the case was properly instructed as to the applicable law.

We have many times stated that the authority of this court- under such circumstances as set forth is strictly, limited.. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mizula v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  2. Eaton v. MarcelleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
  3. Moulton v. Sanford & Cape Porpoise Railway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  4. Parsons v. HuffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856
  5. Young v. PotterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burtchell v. WilleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  2. Avery v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Beck v. SampsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
  4. Fossett v. DurantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  5. Johnson v. KreuzerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API