Legal Opinion

Baker v. Petrin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 23, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

This is an action of trespass quare clausum, brought in the Superior Court for York County, to recover statutory double damages for the destruction of a long guard rail fence on land claimed by the plaintiffs under a lease from the heirs of the original proprietors of “South Point Cottage Lots” so-called, at Biddeford Pool in the city of Biddeford, Maine. The action is brought by Edna Heard Baker, Janet G. Edwards and Frances P. Wood against Arthur Petrin, Wilfred Bolduc, Norbert Tremblay, Antonio Mariello, Arthur Pratt and Antoine Martel. The defendants filed plea of the general issue with…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. HubbardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  2. Hill v. LordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1861
  3. Hunter v. TotmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  4. Torrey v. Congress Square Hotel Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  5. McCully v. BesseySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Town of Manchester v. Augusta Country ClubSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. Pullin v. VictorIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Vachon v. Inhabitants of the Town of LisbonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. Concerned Loved Ones & Lot Owners Ass'n v. PenceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Town of Kittery v. MacKenzieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API