Legal Opinion

Mizula v. Sawyer

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 18, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, C. J.

Cases tried together. Verdicts against defendant O’Donnell in each case. Verdict for defendant Sawyer in each case. Cases come forward on plaintiffs’ motions on usual grounds to set aside verdicts in Sawyer’s favor and also special motions to set aside same verdicts because of misconduct of Sawyer’s counsel. Action for damages by reason of collision between automobile and pedestrians alleged to have been caused by joint or concurrent negligence of defendants, whose cars collided in such a manner as to cause O’Donnell’s car to strike plaintiffs Josephine Mizula and Mary Cherepowitch and to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Learned v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Duplessis v. GuyonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  3. Dziedzic v. Newmarket Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  4. Davis v. Stowe TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  2. Werner v. LaneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Barlow v. LowerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  4. In Re Everett's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  5. St. Pierre v. HoudeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API