Legal Opinion

Young v. Potter

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 10, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

Actions in tort, brought by the wife for personal injuries and by the husband for medical expense, loss of services and consortium of his wife, resulting from an automobile accident on Temple Street in Portland June 17, 1933. The jury’s verdicts were for the defendant and now both cases are before us on motions and exceptions.

These actions tried together compelled the jury, it would seem, to pass upon the veracity of the litigants, for their versions of the occurrence were absolutely at variance and hopelessly irreconcilable.

The day before the accident the defendant’s mother had purchased a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ayers v. RatsheskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Jenkins v. North Shore Dye House, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Avery v. ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  4. Mizula v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  5. Raymond v. Portland RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barlow v. LowerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  2. Desmond v. WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  3. Eaton v. MarcelleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
  4. Blanchard v. BassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  5. Nadeau v. FoggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API