Legal Opinion
Nichols v. AMAX COAL COMPANY
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1986No. 84S01-8604-CV-318PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIVAN, Chief Justice.
In the original opinion in this case, published in 481 N.E.2d 1103, the Court of Appeals, First District, was unanimous in its decision that the trial court should be affirmed; however, on a petition for rehearing, Judge Ratliff filed a dissent, published in 482 N.E.2d 776, to the denial of said petition. We grant appellant's petition for transfer and vacate the opinion of the Court of Appeals.
The facts in the case are: In February, 1973, appellant entered into an oral contract for employment with Amax Fly Ash, Inc. This employment ceased in 1976 upon the termination of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Adams v. LurosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Snyder v. Tell City ClinicIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Whitehouse v. QuinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Nichols v. Amax Coal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. KopaniIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Hildebrand v. HildebrandDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
- Bellwether Properties, LLC v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2017
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,803 Ivan Avery, Mary Avery, and Joseph Swango, by His Next Friend, Mary Avery v. Mapco Gas Products, Incorporated, Doing Business as Thermo Gas Company of New Paris v. Honeywell, Incorporated, Ivan Avery, Mary Avery, and Joseph Swango, by His Next Friend, Mary Avery v. Mapco Gas Products, Incorporated, Doing Business as Thermo Gas Company of New Paris, and Honeywell, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.