Legal Opinion
Guy v. SCHULDT
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1956No. 29,364PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.
The appellant brought this action against the appellees to recover damages for medical malpractice. The issue arises upon a demurrer filed by the appellees on the ground that appellant’s claim was barred by the two year statute of limitations for malpractice. Acts 1941, ch. 116, §1, p. 328, being §2-627, Burns’ 1946 Replacement. The court sustained the demurrer. The appellant refused to plead over, and judgment was entered accordingly.
The appellant alleges in his complaint in substance the following facts:
That the appellees-defendants as physicians and surgeons treated appellant from March…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kincheloe v. FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Schmit v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Sherfey v. City of BrazilIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Nardone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.