Legal Opinion

Whitehouse v. Quinn

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1982No. 2-682A189PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIELDS, Judge.

Appellant David Whitehouse (White-house) is appealing an adverse summary judgment rendered in favor of Thomas M. Quinn, Jr. and Clark and Clark (Quinn) on Whitehouse’s two-eount complaint for attorney negligence and breach of an attorney-client contract. Whitehouse contends the judgment is erroneous because:

1) The contract claim was governed by the twenty-year statute of limitation applicable to contracts in writing other than those for the payment of money,

and, in any event

2) The statute(s) of limitation applicable to both claims was (were) tolled since Quinn’s failure to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Letson v. LowmasterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Hinds v. McNairIndiana Supreme Court · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Whitehouse v. QuinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Conard v. WaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. McMahan v. Snap on Tool Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Janet E. Pitts v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Tolen v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API