Whitehouse v. Quinn
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, Judge.
Appellant David Whitehouse (White-house) is appealing an adverse summary judgment rendered in favor of Thomas M. Quinn, Jr. and Clark and Clark (Quinn) on Whitehouse’s two-eount complaint for attorney negligence and breach of an attorney-client contract. Whitehouse contends the judgment is erroneous because:
1) The contract claim was governed by the twenty-year statute of limitation applicable to contracts in writing other than those for the payment of money,
and, in any event
2) The statute(s) of limitation applicable to both claims was (were) tolled since Quinn’s failure to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Letson v. LowmasterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hinds v. McNairIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Whitehouse v. QuinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Conard v. WaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- McMahan v. Snap on Tool Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Janet E. Pitts v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Tolen v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.