Legal Opinion
City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 2009No. 49S02-0808-CV-436PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
When riverboat gambling came to Indiana and to East Chicago, the appli*615cant for the gaming license and the City of East Chicago negotiated certain arrangements to commit part of the resulting revenue toward economic and workforce development in the City. Several private corporations were created to facilitate those efforts. When the Indiana Gaming Commission issued a license for East Chicago, it conditioned the license on those arrangements.
On the issues joined by the City and these corporations in the present appeal (one of several appeals), we hold certain of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of New Haven v. ReichhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Malachowski v. Bank One, IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Arnold v. DirrimIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- OEC-Diasonics, Inc. v. MajorIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Fager v. HundtIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Logan v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Thornton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Farmers Elevator Co. of Oakville, Inc. v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Entm't USA, Inc. v. Moorehead Commc'ns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Murat Temple Ass'n v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.