Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Amax Coal Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1985No. 1-1084A250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION DISSENTING TO DENIAL OF REHEARING

RATLIFF, Presiding Judge.

In our original opinion, 481 N.E.2d 1108, we stated that fraud and concealment must be specifically pleaded. At 1105. We further held that because Nichols failed to plead fraudulent concealment by Amax that the statute of limitations was not tolled. At 1105.

Our holding appears to me to be directly contrary to our prior holding in Adams v. Luros (1980), Ind.App., 406 N.E.2d 1199, 1201-02, where we said:

*777"We make one more point in this regard concerning the theory of fraudulent concealment raised by Adams. Dr. Lu-ros presents at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Spoljaric v. PanganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Monsanto Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Adams v. LurosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. DeHart v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bellwether Properties, LLC v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Nichols v. AMAX COAL COMPANYIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Carter v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2012
  4. Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C., Northwest Surgery Center, LLC, d/b/a Foot & Ankle Surgery Center, f/k/a Foot & Ankle Surgery Center, LLC and Anthony E. Miller, D.P.M. v. Barnes & Thornburg, LLPIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C., Northwest Surgery Center, LLC, d/b/a Foot & Ankle Surgery Center, f/k/a Foot & Ankle Surgery Center, LLC and Anthony E. Miller, D.P.M. v. Barnes & Thornburg, LLPIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API