Legal Opinion

Catalin Corp. of America v. Slosse

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 22, 1939No. 8323Published

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

These are cross motions, the plaintiff’s being to confirm the reports of the Special Master, and that of the defendant, to reject them, and for a denial of the plaintiff’s . motion to punish the defendant for contempt of the decree and injunction dated August 27, 1937, and September 15, 1937, adjudging plaintiff’s patent, Reissue No. 19170 of No. 1854600, valid and infringed, and enjoining the defendant from infringement.

The single, issue' referred to the Special Master was whether the defendant had been guilty of contempt, and the record has been reviewed solely to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
  2. Catalin Corporation of America v. Catalazuli Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. United States Rubber Reclaiming WorksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1915
  4. Catalin Corp. of America v. Catalazuli Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
  5. Steinfur Patents Corp. v. Moos Fur Dyeing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API