Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. United States Rubber Reclaiming Works
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. Suit in equity by the Philadelphia Rubber Works Company against the United States Rubber Reclaiming Works. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decree of the District Court,. Western District of New York, for injunction and accounting in a suit for alleged infringement of a patent.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. Suit in equity by the Philadelphia Rubber Works Company against the United States Rubber Reclaiming Works. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decree of the District Court,. Western District of New York, for injunction and accounting in a suit for alleged infringement of a patent. The patent sued upon is No. 635,141, granted October 17, 1899, to Arthur H. .Marks for a “process for reclaiming rubber from vulcanized rubber waste.” The single claim reads…
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
Both Judge Clarke and Judge Hazel' have elaborately discussed the questions presented in these two causes,.- *151and in their opinions there will be found quotations from the records and testimony, which need not be here repeated; the opinions should be consulted for a comprehensive statement of the controversy. It is sufficient here briefly to indicate why this court has reached the conclusion hereinafter indicated.
There is a mass of testimony in the record, dealing technically and scientifically with the theories as to just how the solution of the patent acts upon the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. U. S. Rubber Reclaiming WorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- A. B. Dick Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. Portage Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. Machlett & SonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. United States Rubber Reclaiming WorksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.