Legal Opinion

Capitol Well Servicing Company v. Levescy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 23, 1962No. 39622PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

Under review in this proceeding is the trial tribunal’s order allowing claimant additional benefits during the continuance of his recurrent interval of temporary incapacity.

While engaged for the employer on June 30, 1958, claimant admittedly sustained an accidental injury to his back. Placed by the employer under the care of Dr. E. M., an orthopedist, he initially received outpatient treatment consisting of diathermy and massage. His complaints continued without improvement or remission. On November 13, 1958, claimant underwent corrective surgery, in the course of which Dr.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative Association v. MaddenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Barnsdall Refining Co. v. RamsdallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Rodriquez v. Utilities Engineering & ConstructionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Seismograph Service Corporation v. CosbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. GillumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Wade Lahar Construction Company v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Benning v. Pennwell Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Bama Pie, Ltd. v. RaesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Hondo Petroleum Company v. PiearcySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API