Legal Opinion

Wade Lahar Construction Company v. Howell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 7, 1962No. 39898PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

In the present proceeding we are called upon to review an award of the State Industrial Court finding claimant’s residual disability to have undergone a change from 30.5 per centum permanent (partial) to permanent total.

While engaged for the employer in construction work on July 21, 1956, claimant was in process of removing dirt beneath a pipeline when the ditch suddenly caved in burying him completely. He remained below the surface for an undisclosed length of time. When removed, he was unconscious during a period of undetermined duration. Taken to the hospital, he was later…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rialto Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. National Zinc Company v. HainlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Woodward & Company v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Capitol Well Servicing Company v. LevescySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. StocktonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Benning v. Pennwell Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Oklahoma City v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Bama Pie, Ltd. v. RaesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. HighfillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API