Legal Opinion
Hondo Petroleum Company v. Piearcy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 9, 1962No. 39617PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
Under review in this proceeding is the trial tribunal’s order allowing claimant con tinuing temporary benefits upon recurrence of his healing period.
Following an accidental injury to his back on September 22, 1958, claimant remained totally incapacitated for labor and drew temporary benefits until November 9, 1959. Compensation for his residual impairments, determined on January 15, 1960, at 20 per centum permanent (partial) disability, or 100 weeks, was ordered to commence on November 9, 1959 — the point of time when the healing period had ended. Under the method of payment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gardner Petroleum Co. v. PoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Pruitt v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Capitol Well Servicing Company v. LevescySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Kerr's, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Galey Molloy v. BeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. GillumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Benning v. Pennwell Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Ríos Rivera v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1979
- Nuway Laundry Company v. HackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.