Benning v. Pennwell Publishing Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OP ALA, Justice.
The single issue presented on certiorari is: Was the review panel’s [panel] critical conclusion of law responsive to the dispositive issue of fact formed in the evidentiary proceeding before the trial judge of the Workers’ Compensation Court? We answer in the negative. Because of the panel’s failure to address the pivotal question of fact by a definite ruling susceptible of judicial interpretation, the claim must be remanded for resolution to be effected by requisite findings and conclusions. 1
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
Jack Benning’s [Benning, claimant, employee or worker]…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Burdick v. Independent School District No. 52Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- McCracken v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Owings v. Pool Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Lanman v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.