Marathon Oil Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending before the court are Marathon Oil Company’s Motion For Partial Stay Of An Agency Order, and defendant’s Motion For Protective Order. Both motions have been briefed and oral argument was heard May 23, 1989. After argument, the court ruled from the bench denying plaintiff’s motion and granting defendant’s motion. This opinion further explains the basis for the court’s ruling.
BACKGROUND
This is an action for the return of royalty payments on various oil and gas leases in the Kenai Field in Alaska. The following recitation of background facts is drawn from the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Halim v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Kalick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- First Atlas Funding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.