Legal Opinion

Kalick v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 21, 2013No. 12-783 CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se; Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); Transfer for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; 28 U.S.C. § 1631

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Chief Judge

Before the court is plaintiffs First Complaint1 (Complaint or Compl.), Docket *554Number (Dkt. No.) 1, filed by Andrew P. Kaliek, pro se, on November 15, 2012; Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction (defendant’s Motion or Def.’s Mot.), Dkt. No. 5, filed on January 14, 2013; Plaintiffs Reply to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (plaintiffs Response2 or Pl.’s Resp.), Dkt. No. 7, filed on January 25, 2013 by leave of the court; and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. The Estate of Jason Allen Smallwood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Brickey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API