Legal Opinion
Halim v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 24, 2012No. 12-5 CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEWITT, Chief Judge.
This case involves breach of contract claims by Ahmed Halim, plaintiff, against the United States, defendant, acting through its Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). See generally Third Am. Compl. for Breach of Contract (amended Complaint or Am. Compl.), Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 9. The amended Complaint claims that HUD breached the following four contracts: a housing assistance payment (HAP) contract associated with an apartment complex in Schenectady, New York (Schenectady Property), id. ¶¶ 4-9; a Section 8 HAP sales contract associated with the Nichols…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Halim v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Cycenas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Driessen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Evans v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.