Girvin v. Simon
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. Edward I. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Action to foreclose an assessment, for street improvements in the city of Stockton. The defendant had judgment, and plaintiffs appeal therefrom on the judgment-roll; and their contention is that the conclusions of law are not correctly drawn from the findings of fact.
Among other persons affected by said improvements and assessment was one H. M. Fanning, who was the owner of certain premises which were assessed, but said Fanning had no interest in the lot involved in this case. The court also found “that the defendant, J. Simon, and other holders of property affected by said work and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Belser v. HoffschneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Barber v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Mahoney v. BravermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People v. O'NeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by5 opinions
- Creed v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Halsted v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- L. A. Paving Co. v. Los Angeles Foundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Southern Construction Co. v. HowellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Federal Construction Co. v. KneeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918