Federal Construction Co. v. Kneese
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District to compel a superintendent of streets to sign a contract for street improvement. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLY, J., pro tem.
The Federal Construction Company petitions for a writ of mandate to compel the superintendent of streets of Daly City to sign a contract for the improvement of certain streets of that municipality pursuant to proceedings taken by its board of trustees-under the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730), in conjunction with the act amendatory thereof of 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 1464).
The case is an amicable one instituted for the purpose of determining the validity of the proceeding involved to the point which they have reached.
The first objection to the proceedings is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mahoney v. BravermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Creed v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Farley v. ReindollarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Girvin v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. O'NeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richardson v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933