L. A. Paving Co. v. Los Angeles Foundry Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Frank G. Finlayson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.
This is an action to foreclose a street assessment lien on certain land of the defendant in the city of Vernon. The work was done under the Vrooman Act (Stats. 1885] p. 147, and subsequent amendments, General Laws of California, Act 3930). The lower court found, in brief, that the work has been dune and that all the proceedings were regular with the exception that an appeal by the defendant to the town trustees, duly taken after the issuance of the assessment warrant, had not been regularly passed upon and decided against the defendant. Upon these findings the court concluded1 that the action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Pacific Paving Co. v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- McCaleb v. DreyfusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Los Angeles v. WaldronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Boyle v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kelly v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Chapman v. RudolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- City of South San Francisco v. Santa Clara Valley Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923