Legal Opinion
Halsted v. County of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 1966No. Civ. 640PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
Donald E. Halsted and Ann Halsted, his wife, are land owners in the Strong Ranch Slough Drainage Assessment District in Sacramento County. Believing that the board of supervisors was guilty of arbitrary action and abuse of discretion in approving an assessment against them of approximately one-fourth of the total cost of construction of the Bell Avenue bridge, under the Improvement Act of 1911 (div. 7, Sts. & Hy. Code), the plaintiffs filed a suit against the county, the board of supervisors, the department of public works, the county engineer, the county treasurer, and the Lentz Construction…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Payne v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Federal Construction Co. v. EnsignCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Greenberg v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Coffman v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Harrison v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- City of Tiburon v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Cordonier v. Central Shopping Plaza AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.