Franks v. Lopez
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
Today we are again asked to interpret R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) to determine when a political subdivision may be liable for failing to keep its roadways “free from nuisance.” We are also asked to decide whether the county could be liable for its alleged failure to install a guardrail pursuant to R.C. 5591.36. For the reasons which follow, we decline to expand our definition of the term “nuisance” as found in R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) to embrace design and construction defects or the failure to erect signage or guardrails. However, we hold that questions of fact remain as to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vogel v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Manufacturer's National Bank v. Erie County Road CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Winwood v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Fankhauser v. City of MansfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Williamson v. PavlovichOhio Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Cater v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Helton v. Scioto County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Greene County Agricultural Society v. LimingOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Wilson v. Stark County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.