Legal Opinion

Maret v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 1998No. C-980221PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Judge.

This is a case brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), Section 51 et seq., Title 45, U.S.Code, by a railroad employee who was injured when a train on which he was working was hit by a car. The employee claimed that the railroad negligently failed to provide a reasonably safe working environment for him. We must now decide if he presented enough evidence of negligence to withstand the railroad’s motion for summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

On September 13, 1994, at approximately 6:30 p.m., plaintiff-appellant Gary S. Maret was working as a switchman for his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CSX Transp., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. State v. HsuOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Waldron v. EdingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Gordon v. Dollar General CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API