Winwood v. City of Dayton
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The issue presented by this cause is whether a municipality is liable in tort for damages alleged to be caused by the lack of traffic control devices at an intersection. We hold that no such liability may be imposed.
In Enghauser Mfg. Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 31, 6 OBR 53, 451 N.E. 2d 228, this court partially abolished the judicially created doctrine of municipal immun*284ity. Id. at paragraph one of the syllabus. This immunity was preserved, however, for “* * * those acts or omissions involving * * * the exercise of an executive or planning function involving the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Marrek v. Cleveland Metroparks Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Zents v. Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Mitchell v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Strohofer v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Rhodus v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Franks v. LopezOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Perkins v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Dayton v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Essman v. PortsmouthOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.