Legal Opinion

Storrs v. Belmont Gold Mining & Milling Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1938No. Civ. 2118PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Belmont Gold Mining and Milling Company (hereinafter called the mining company), quieting title in and to eighteen lode mining claims, and one mill site claim, except against the mortgage interest of defendant Roger J. O’Reilley, and the paramount title of the United States.

Plaintiffs commenced this action to quiet title to the claims. The mining company denied plaintiffs’ title, asserted title in itself, and filed a cross-complaint to quiet title against plaintiffs. 0’Reilley denied plaintiffs’ title and asserted the lien of his mortgage. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McLean v. LadewigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Depner v. Joseph Zukin BlousesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Meridian L. Ins. v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Jones v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Inlow v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trusty v. RayIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Myrick v. O'NeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. First National Bank v. AldridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Pease v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Sampson v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API