Pease v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
Plaintiff Carl Erikson brought this action to quiet title to mining claims situated in the Julian-Banner Mining District of San Diego County. Since this appeal was filed, C. C. Pease has been substituted as appellant, as the successor in interest of Erikson. The controversy herein concerns the validity of locations by the parties and their predecessors in interest of two mining claims, generally described in. the record as the East and West Claims. These claims, particularly described in the findings, are paraEel and are separated by what is known as the Golden Chariot Mine Patent Lot No. 39.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Stock v. PlunkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Del Giorgio v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Kramer v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Brown v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sampson v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hines v. HubbleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Pascoe v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Pete Lien & Sons, Inc. v. ZellmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Swallow v. Calcium Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960