Legal Opinion
First National Bank v. Aldridge
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1939No. Civ. 6175PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSEN, J., pro tem.
By this action respondent, a national bank, recovered judgment for the possession of a tract of land in Butte County, together with $450 for rentals due. Defendants have appealed on the judgment roll and a bill of exceptions.
Appellants attack many of the findings but except in a single instance, which will be noted later, they have failed to present all the evidence on these points and, upon familiar principles, we must consider such findings sufficiently supported.
The essential facts as shown by the findings, are these: During the year 1934, one B. E. Meyers became…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ellingson v. Walsh, O'Connor & BarnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Maguire v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Bre DDR BR Whittwood Ca LLC v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Timm v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- BRE DDR BR Whittwood CA v. Farmers & Merchants etc.California Court of Appeal · 2017