Legal Opinion
Myrick v. O'Neill
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1939No. Civ. 6045PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HELD, J., pro tem.
On May 1, 1931, and for some time prior thereto, title to the premises involved in this action was in Susana Land Company, a California corporation. The corporation failed to pay its franchise tax in 1930, and thereupon and on May 1, 1931, its corporate powers, rights and privileges were suspended pursuant to section 32 of the Bank and Corporation Franchise Tax Act. (Deering’s 1937 General Laws, Act 8488.) There has been no revivor of corporate powers. After the date of such suspension, and on December 11, 1931, the corporation executed a deed for the premises to Susan…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Cleveland v. Gore Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Depner v. Joseph Zukin BlousesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Storrs v. Belmont Gold Mining & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- City Investments, Ltd. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clemons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Guthman v. MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Performance Plastering v. Richmond American Homes of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Damato v. SlevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Siedletz v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.