Legal Opinion

Anderson-Bey v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 11, 2006No. Civil Action 00-2000(RCL)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendants’ Motion [77 & 80] to Dismiss or for Summary-Judgment. Upon consideration of the Motion, plaintiffs’ opposition, the reply thereto, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Motion is

DENIED as to Defendant District of Columbia. Having determined that plaintiffs have stated claims for the violation of their constitutional rights against the individual defendants, but not having had the benefit of briefing on the issue of qualified immunity, the Court hereby

ORDERS that…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Candido v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. Long v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Konah v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Pinson v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Majhor v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API