Legal Opinion
Mica SAINT-JEAN, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 7, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2008-1769PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Mica Saint-Jean, Guerline Bourciquot, and Marie Dorlus have brought claims against defendant District of Columbia (“D.C.”) under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207, et seq., the D.C. Whistleblower Protection Act (“WPA”), D.C.Code § 1-615.51, et seq., and local statutory and common law arising from an alleged scheme which required them to pay kickbacks to their supervisor in order to receive overtime assignments. D.C. has moved to dismiss those claims. 1 Because the plaintiffs’ FLSA and WPA claims are…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Winder v. ErsteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Scahill v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Wilson v. Hunam Inn, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Owens v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Beg Investments, LLC v. AlbertiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.