Legal Opinion

Scahill v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 25, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-2076PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs Martin Scahill and HRH Services, LLC filed this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging conditions placed on a liquor license issued to HRH for its restaurant, the Alibi, by the District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (“Board”). The conditions essentially prevent Scahill from entering the premises or playing any role in the business, which plaintiffs claim violates a number of their constitutional rights. Currently before the Court is [10] defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of standing and for failure…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Martin Scahill & HRH Servs. LLC v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Pub. Citizen, Inc. v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Scahill v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  4. In re Navy ChaplaincyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Bailey v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API