Legal Opinion
Dietzel v. Planning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 3, 2000No. AC 19063PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
In this land use appeal, the intervenors, Kathleen Oppenheimer and William Oppenheimer (Oppen-heimers), appeal from the denial by the trial court of their motion to open the judgment approving a settlement agreement entered into between the plaintiffs, Alfred S. Dietzel and Sharon L. Dietzel (Dietzels), and the defendant, the planning commission of the town of *155Redding (commission). On appeal, the Oppenheimers claim that the court improperly (1) concluded that they lacked standing to participate in the settlement agreement between the Dietzels and the commission under General…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Couch v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Rybinski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Murphy v. New Milford Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Grasso v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Groton Long Point Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Diamond 67, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Town of Griswold v. CamputaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.