Securities and Exchange Commission v. International Chemical Development Corporation, and Golden Rule Associates
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
I
NATURE OF THE CASE
The defendants-appellants were enjoined in the district court pursuant to various sections of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Specifically, they were enjoined from further violations of the registration requirements, the antifraud provisions and reporting requirements provided for in these acts. 1
The case was tried on its merits to the court, and following a three day presentation of evidence an injunction was entered enjoining the defendants from continued violations of the mentioned provisions.
Originally,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- General Motors Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chinese Consol. Benev. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. G. N. Van Horn, Bert Chesnut and Commercial Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. James E. Corr, Iii, and Roger DrayerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- In Re Lehman Bros. Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WolfsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.