Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
Section 4 (1) of the Securities Act of 1933 exempts “transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering” 1 from the registration requirements of § 5. 2 We must decide whether Ralston Purina’s offerings of treasury stock to its “key employees” are within this exemption. On a complaint brought by the Commission under § 20 (b) of the Act seeking to enjoin respondent’s unregistered offerings, the District Court held the exemption applicable and dismissed the suit. 3 The Court of Appeals affirmed. 4 The question has arisen .many times since the Act was passed; an apparent need to define…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sunbeam Gold Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- In Re LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by435 opinions
- Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
430 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.