Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Wolfson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 2, 2008No. 06-4035PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
In this civil enforcement action, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”) charged that Jon R. Marple (“Marple”) and Grateful Internet Associates, LLC (“Grateful”), 1 violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“ § 10(b)”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b); Commission Rule 10b-5 (“Rule 10b-5”), 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5; and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“ § 17(a)”), 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a), in relation to material misstatements and omissions contained within a public company’s periodic financial reports filed with the Commission. Marple,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. TamboneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Morris v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. VilarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Freudenberg v. E Trade Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.