Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chinese Consol. Benev. Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 6, 1941No. 232PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission seeks to enjoin the defendant from the use of any instruments of interstate commerce or of the mails in disposing, or attempting to dispose, of Chinese Government bonds for which no registration statement has ever been made.
The defendant is a New York corporation organized for benevolent purposes having a membership of 25,000 Chinese. On September 1, 1937, the Republic of China authorized the issuance of $500,000,000 in 4% Liberty Bonds, and on May 1, 1938 authorized a further issue of $50,000,000 in 5% bonds. In October,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Associated Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. TorrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Link, Petter & Co. v. PollieMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. StarmontDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1940
3Cited by66 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,000 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edward E. HolschuhCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- In Re Lehman Bros. Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Ingenito v. Bermec Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.