Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wells

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 2009No. 052271E2; A137233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment declaring plaintiffs to be the owners of a strip of property based on the trial court’s conclusion that plaintiffs had established a boundary agreement or adverse possession of the property by clear and convincing evidence. As part of its judgment, the trial court also awarded plaintiffs damages and allowed reasonable attorney fees. Defendants contend that the trial court erred in determining that plaintiffs had presented evidence to establish ownership of the property at issue by a boundary agreement or adverse possession and that it erred in awarding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petersen v. FielderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Davis v. ParkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Ross v. DeLorenzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Gibbons v. LettowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ramos v. PotkowskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API