Legal Opinion

Davis v. Parke

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 1995No. 94CV009; CA A85859PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

This action involves ownership of a disputed strip of land. Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring them to be the owners of the disputed property by adverse possession, declaring the legal boundaries of the property, and for injunc-tive relief. The trial court quieted title to the disputed property in defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. On de nouo review, ORS 19.125(3), we reverse.

Plaintiffs live on a 95-acre ranch, which they purchased in 1959. Their property borders defendants’ property on the north, south and west. A common fence indicates what plaintiffs believed was the property boundary.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Slak v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Schoeller v. KulawiakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Kohler v. AlspawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Montgomery v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. GobbleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Simpson v. Golden Resorts, LLLPSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  3. Nooteboom v. BulsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Baylink v. ReesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Motes v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API