Legal Opinion

Ross v. DeLorenzo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 1983No. 80-4535-NJ-2; CA A25612PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

This case involves a boundary dispute. Defendants appeal a judgment entered after a trial to the court declaring the boundary between plaintiffs property and theirs and awarding plaintiff damages for trespass. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and reverse and remand.

The parcels of property at issue are Lots 1 and 2 in Block 2 of the Daley and Emery Additions to Eagle Point. At one time the two lots were owned by Josephine Holmes who built two houses and a duplex east of the houses on them. In 1973, after the three structures had been built, Holmes conveyed Lot 2 to plaintiffs predecessor, who…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Norgard v. Busher Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Weniger v. RipleyOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Clark v. HindmanOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Kincaid v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Drury Et Ux v. PekarOregon Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brunswick v. RundellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Markovich v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Lenn v. BottemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Blaisdell v. NelsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Gibbons v. LettowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API