Legal Opinion

Gibbons v. Lettow

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 13, 2002No. 99CV3178CC; A111902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

At issue in this case is the right to possess a strip of land that lies between the parties’ properties. Plaintiffs, who hold title of record to the strip, brought an action for ejectment and damages. Defendants counterclaimed, seeking a declaration quieting title in their favor based on theories of adverse possession, boundary by agreement, and “mutual acquiescence.” The trial court found in favor of defendants on their theory of adverse possession. Plaintiffs appeal, arguing that defendants failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence the elements of adverse possession, in particular,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Whitley v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ross v. DeLorenzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Brunswick v. RundellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Manderscheid v. DuttonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Agrons v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Powers Ranch Co. v. Plum Creek Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Wright v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Ramos v. PotkowskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API