Legal Opinion
Ostendorf v. Kenyon
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 1984No. C9-83-1677PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
David Ostendorf and Mary Ostendorf sued a number of parties, including the State of Minnesota, concerning a traffic accident. After discovery, the State moved for a partial summary judgment dismissing it from the suit because the design of highways, including signing and striping, is a discretionary act and the state has discretionary immunity. The trial judge granted the motion and dismissed the State. On September 27, 1983, the trial judge certified the partial summary judgment appeal-able in a modified order. The Ostendorfs appeal. We affirm in part and reverse and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Cairl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Nieting v. BlondellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, BrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Cook v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Peavler v. BD. OF COM'RS MONROE CTY.Indiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Steinke v. City of AndoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Bird v. State, Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Freier v. Independent School District No. 197Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Johnson v. County of NicolletCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.