Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Rauch

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 5, 2002No. 02-0652PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

An Iowa attorney is charged with improper ex parte communications with several judges, -deceiving the court, and neglect of client matters. The Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics and Conduct filed a complaint with our Grievance Commission against Allan Rauch, alleging he violated several ethical rules. The Commission recommended we suspend Rauch’s license to practice law for seven months. Our review is required by Iowa Court Rule. 35.10 (2002). We agree with the Commission’s findings of misconduct and suspend Rauch’s license to practice law for one year.

I. Facts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BauerleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PostmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LesyshenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James C. Van GinkelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. KallsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. MoonenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API