Legal Opinion

Meyer v. McKeown

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 26, 1994No. 3-93-0912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

We are asked to decide whether allegedly libelous statements published by a village trustee in a newsletter sent to 1,200 postal customers in and around the village were privileged communications. Defendant Douglas McKeown, a member of the village board of the Village of Minooka, Illinois (the village), indicated in his newsletter that Donald Meyer, plaintiff, had not completed work as promised in connection with a subdivision development and had received special favors from the village. Defendant also alluded to conflicts of interest between three village trustees and plaintiff because of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Geick v. KayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Blair v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Costanzo v. GaulOhio Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kopchar v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Village of South BarringtonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. O'Connor v. SmithCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1996
  4. Kopchar v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API