Legal Opinion

Costanzo v. Gaul

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1980No. 79-532PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant sets forth the following single proposition of law:

“A statement made by a city councilman when he was interviewed by a newspaper reporter is not qualifiedly privileged where the statement is not made in good faith, is not limited in its scope to a topic upon which said councilman has a right, duty or interest to speak, is not made upon a proper occasion, and is published in an improper manner and to improper parties.”

In resolving the questions presented, we must briefly review the applicable law. of slander and, more particularly, the applicable principles of the law of privilege…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hahn v. KottenOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mills v. DennySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Scott v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Wachsmuth v. Merchants' National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Central Ohio Building & Construction Trades CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Burkes v. StidhamOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Cent. Ohio Bldg. & Constr. Trades CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Evely v. Carlon Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Smith v. KleinOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API