Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Smith

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided March 8, 1996No. 94-CC-3084PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Epstein, J.

This is a libel action by one State official against another. This intergovernmental libel claim is before us on the Respondents’ misdesignated section 2 — 615 motion to dismiss which asserts, alternatively, the defenses of absolute privilege and qualified privilege of public officials for intergovernmental communications within the scope of their official duties. Without objection by, nor prejudice to, the Claimant, Respondents’ motion is treated as a section 2 — 619 motion. For this purpose the well pleaded facts alleged in the complaint must be taken as true.1

Also before…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Currie v. LaoIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Healy v. VaupelIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Samuel Colaizzi and Samuel Indovina v. Daniel Walker, Governor, State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Toth v. EnglandAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Carmody v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. Toth v. EnglandAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API