Legal Opinion

Cattus v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 12, 1913No. 1019PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 29834 (T. D. 32830).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case was imported in part under the tariff act of 1897 and in part under the act of 1909. The questions made in both instances are identical; therefore for convenience those only which came within the earlier act will be mentioned in this decision.

The importations consist of parasols of various sizes covered with material other than paper. They were reported by the appraiser to be suitable for use as sunshades, and were returned for classification under the denominative provisions of paragraph 462 of the tariff act of 1897. That paragraph reads as follows:

462.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. United States v. MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. Wallau Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API