Legal Opinion

Illfelder v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 28, 1916No. 1580PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 37852.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The present importations consist of small wooden boxes containing water colors, crayons, brushes, and drawing materials, and are called water-color boxes.

The collector classified these as toys, and accordingly assessed duty, thereon at 35 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 342 of the tariff act of 1913.

The importers protested against the assessment, claiming the goods to be dutiable at 15 per cent ad valorem as paints or colors under the first clause of paragraph 63 of the same act; or alternately at 20 per cent ad valorem as artists’ paints or colors, or as color lakes under the second or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. Kraemer & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United States v. Meier & Frank Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. United States v. Mobay Chemical Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  3. Smith & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API